Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AMC couples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel Bryant 10:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of AMC couples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Neutral bump from speedy. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-11 04:19Z

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 04:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of TV-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 04:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Must apologize, understood "AMC" as some kind of school and therefor considered the article as useless spam (i made the speedy). Nevertheless, since almost all of these couples don't have a wikipedia entry, i don't think a listing article is needed. Those relationships who are actually essential can be listed at the main page of whatever AMC is. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 04:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as blatant listcruft. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.--TBCΦtalk? 04:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I would note that while there aren't entries on most couples as couples, there are probably entries on most characters by themselves (more than 100 entries in Category:All My Children characters). Perhaps merge with List of All My Children storylines or List of All My Children characters somehow? —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-11 04:34Z
• Delete per TBC, and probably make it a cat. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 06:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Categorization is not possible. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-11 08:16Z

• Why not? Not trying to be confrontational here, but could we just put like [[Category:AMC couples]] or something to the relevant articles? --M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 01:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete my god this is awful. Nardman1 12:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. You've gotta be kidding me. --Mhking 18:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete indiscriminate list about a fictional show, no real encyclopedic value.-- danntm ^T _C 21:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non encyclopaedic. Peterkingiron 23:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Peterkingiron. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.