Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albania–Australia bilateral treaties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Albania–Australia bilateral treaties (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

we do not create articles simply for listing bilateral treaties (especially when so few exist between these 2 countries). there aren't even 2 treaties. The second is actually an exchange of notes recognising the original treaty about the same thing. So there is actually only one treaty

It could be merged into the bilateral articles but that is being considered for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albania–Australia relations LibStar (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - Wikipedia is not a mirror of the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's Treaty Database, and this is not a notable topic. A number of similar articles have been created over recent weeks (Australia–Cuba bilateral treaties, Australia–Denmark bilateral treaties, etc) and all suffer from the same problem. Nick-D (talk) 05:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no indication that these treaties have any impact on the world today - fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.