Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stunna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stunna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism; non-sourced slang term Mhking (talk) 21:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I see the term showing up on Google news [1], but I really can't make sense of it and the usages don't seem to comport with the articles description. Some of them seem to just be stunner slangified. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Give Him Time It seems the article isn't finnished. I think he may have just gone on a tangent about the term. Make the article more about the practice, mabe if you can find a more official term change the name of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.128.52 (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Complete Over haul This article belongs in the Rites of passage category Distiguish Stunna from Stunter. It would be better to not define the term or find other terms which decribe the same behavior. I put in the section I will help you out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith Nickels (talk • contribs) 21:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTEThis is the user' sole edit as of 19:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC) DFS454

• Delete Non notbale neoglism, wikipedia is not a dictionary --DFS454 (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with the conclusion it is a non-notable (per guidelines) neologism. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - per WP:NOTNEWS and /or WP:NOR, this neologism is too neo to be included. Bearian (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I PRODed this. §FreeRangeFrog 04:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.